Sumogirls Website

border border border border
border border
Home
My Thoughts
Creativity
If Jen Were Prez
Sumogirl FAQ
Read Everything
Links
Advanced Search
Contact Us
- - - - - - -
Happiness Podcast
Happiness Through Humanism Blog
Sumogirl on YouTube
Jen's Humanist Examiner Page
- - - - - - -
Jen-Hancock.com
Jen's News Feeds
Follow on Facebook
- - - - - - -
Free Handy Humanism Handbook
Jen's Book Store
Sumogirl's Store
- - - - - - -
SumoFlash
Welcome to Sumogirl. Here you will find the thoughts, opinions and creative pursuits of Jennifer Hancock, gentlewoman
Sumogirl Site Membership
Want to join in the discussion? You must register with the site first!
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
Registration is required to prevent trolling and spam in the comments section.
Other Menu
Administrator
Sumogirl Statistics
Visitors: 3746455

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Sumogirl's Podcast
Powered by Podbean.com

border
border border border border
border
HomeborderNewsborderContact us
  arrow pointing to the right   Home arrow My Thoughts arrow Pop Culture arrow Pop Culture arrow Corporal Punishment and Religion


Corporal Punishment and Religion PDF Print E-mail

Corporal Punishment and Religion

It is impossible to discuss the morality of corporal punishment on children without addressing the religious beliefs that perpetuate it.

Child abuse in the name of religion is still child abuse

I do not spank my child. Never have. It is unnecessary, abusive and counterproductive to raising a respectful child. How do I know this? I know this because in addition to being a Humanist, I am also an animal trainer. And no reputable animal trainer hits their animals. Why? Because it not only doesn’t work, it strengthens the behavior you don’t want!

If something doesn’t work then there is no good reason to do it. People might persist out of ignorance or superstition, but they aren’t doing it because it works.  In the case of hitting and harming a child, because there is no good reason to do it, it’s considered abusive.  The only reason that can be given to justify it is a religious one.

I bring this up because Adrian Peterson was recently reinstated by the Vikings! http://www.vikings.com/news/article-1/7-Ways-Petersons-Return-Instantly-Improves-the-Vikings-/db96909d-6ce3-4984-9570-331f92f7d135

Adrian Peterson was suspended by the Vikings when his 4 year old son had bruising to his legs and genitals as a result of a “whooping” he received from his father.  Adrian Peterson has not denied hittin his child. He only regrets that he left marks.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2014/09/12/the-details-of-adrian-petersons-arrest-are-disturbing/

So why is this religious issue?  Because there is no rational reason to hit kids with a stick. It’s not a valid training technique. And because his justification for hitting little kids with sticks is partially religious. Check out this article from Religious Child Maltreatment - http://religiouschildmaltreatment.com/2014/09/a-closer-look-at-the-adrian-peterson-case-do-culture-and-religion-matter/

Whenever these situations come up where is kid is seriously injured or killed by a parent who is hitting them with a stick, they are religious. Also, because most modern advocates of hitting kids with sticks are fans of Michael Pearl who wrote the book, To Train Up a Child.  This book is religious and claims that hitting kids with sticks is a biblical thing to do. (see: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2013/04/some-quotes-from-michael-pearl.html)

What you need to know is that Mr. Pearl advocates hitting kids who are only a few months old with sticks.  A few months old, because apparently you have to break their will before they reach 6 months old!

He recommends you whip babies on their bare skin until they stop crying and that you should not be bullied by their crying into stopping!  A non-verbal baby is not capable of bullying an adult male with a stick! The fact this guy thinks they are makes him crazy and abusive. He, the person who is hitting a baby for no good reason is the victim and he is hitting the babies to get them to obey his whims. And yet his religious arguments for spanking and not sparing the rod, is taken as truth by a lot of people.

“Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”  – Steven Weinberg

 


User Comments

Please login or register to add comments

<Previous   Next>

go to top Go To Top go to top
border

Polls
How would you describe yourself?
  
Who's on Sumogirl
We have 31 guests online
Latest News
Most Popular



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

Follow Jen on Facebook Follow Jen on Twitter Follow Jen on LinkedIn Follow Jen on YouTube

Follow Jen's Blog Follow Jen's Podcast Follow Jen on Quora

The Humanist Approach to Grief and Grieving

Humanist Learning Systems

The Humanist Approach to Happiness Life Skills Course

The Humanist Approach to Happiness on sale now!

Jen Hancock's Handy Humanism Handbook

Buy and Introduction to Humanism Now on DVD

The Bully Vaccine by Jennifer Hancock


Advertisement